Gill (Kevin) v. State

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: November 12, 2014
• Docket: 64325
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686, 120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005). Appellant claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence at his sentencing hearing, for failing to move to sever the trial from his co-defendant's trial, for failing to file a motion to suppress the eyewitness identification, and because there was an irreconcilable conflict between counsel and appellant. Appellant failed to provide this court with any of the necessary documents in order to review his claims. Appellant did not provide this court with any transcripts of trial, sentencing, or other hearings at the trial court level, nor did appellant provide this court with the co-defendant's motion to sever. The burden is on the appellant to provide an adequate record enabling this court to review assignments of error. Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37, 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818, 822 n.4 (2004); see also Greene v. State, 96 Nev. 555, 558, 612 P.2d 686, 688 (1980). As appellant failed to meet that burden, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

4 Hardesty 4.4 cistati , J.

Douglas ;e741 es J.

Cherry Ovut J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Story Law Group Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A