Gilkinson v. Engelsted

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gilkinson v. Engelsted

253 A.D. 842, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 1938·Published

Opinion

The action is to recover a commission by a real estate broker who alleges he was the procuring cause of the sale of real property under a contract of employment with the vendor. The appeal is from an order of the County Court of Westchester county reversing, on appeal, a judgment for plaintiff, entered after trial before a jury at the City Court of New Rochelle, and directing a new trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Johnson, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is to recover a commission by a real estate broker who alleges he was the procuring cause of the sale of real property under a contract of employment with the vendor. The appeal is from an order of the County Court of Westchester county reversing, on appeal, a judgment for plaintiff, entered after trial before a jury at the City Court of New Rochelle, and directing a new trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Johnson, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Gilkinson v. Engelsted, 253 A.D. 842, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 842 (Gilkinson v. Engelsted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.