Gilkerson-Sloss Commission Co. v. A. Baldwin & Co.
This text of 17 So. 246 (Gilkerson-Sloss Commission Co. v. A. Baldwin & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This case is similar in all respects to the case of Gilkerson-Sloss Commission Company vs. Yale & Bowling, in Liquidation, No. 11,684, just decided ante, p. —, with the exception that the amount due for attorney’s fees is admitted to be one hundred and fifty dollars, and no objection is urged by counsel for the plaintiff and appellee as to this amount.
The judgment appealed from should be amended and affirmed.
It is therefore ordered and decreed that the judgment appealed from be reduced to one hundred and fifty dollars; and as thus amended, it is further ordered that same be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 So. 246, 47 La. Ann. 696, 1895 La. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilkerson-sloss-commission-co-v-a-baldwin-co-la-1895.