Gilis v. Krulewich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gilis v. Krulewich

195 Ill. App. 384, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 344

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 6, 1915

DocketGen. No. 21,193

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 Ill. App. 384 (Gilis v. Krulewich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilis v. Krulewich, 195 Ill. App. 384, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 344 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Banks and banking, § 200*—when evidence sufficient to show identity of depositor. In an action to recover savings bank deposits made by a man named Powel G., where plaintiff’s name was Paul G. and where plaintiff’s identity with such depositor was disputed, evidence, including disputed signatures, examined and held sufficient to prove that plaintiff was the person who made the deposits in question. 2. Trial, § 285*—when case not argued on trial by court. A court trying a case without a jury is not required to listen to arguments of counsel. 3. Costs, § 67*—when statutory damages not allowed. On an appeal in an action to recover savings bank deposits made by plaintiff, held that plaintiff could not recover statutory damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Banks and banking, § 200*—when evidence sufficient to show identity of depositor. In an action to recover savings bank deposits made by a man named Powel G., where plaintiff’s name was Paul G. and where plaintiff’s identity with such depositor was disputed, evidence, including disputed signatures, examined and held sufficient to prove that plaintiff was the person who made the deposits in question. 2. Trial, § 285*—when case not argued on trial by court. A court trying a case without a jury is not required to listen to arguments of counsel. 3. Costs, § 67*—when statutory damages not allowed. On an appeal in an action to recover savings bank deposits made by plaintiff, held that plaintiff could not recover statutory damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 384, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilis-v-krulewich-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack