Gilham v. State
146 S.E. 28, 167 Ga. 535, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 185
Opinion
Will Gilham was convicted of murder. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and he excepted. The motion is based solely upon the contention that the verdict is not supported by evidence. The evidence supports the verdict. The testimony of the accomplice was corroborated by facts and circumstances sufficient to authorize a jury to return a verdict of guilty.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilham v. State, 146 S.E. 28, 167 Ga. 535, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 185 (Ga. 1928).
146 S.E. 28 (Gilham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.