Gilford v. State
This text of 27 S.W.2d 169 (Gilford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Aggravated assault is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.
*39 The alleged assault was committed upon the wife of the accused. She and several other witnesses testified to facts sufficient to support the verdict. The assault was denied by the appellant. The conflict of evidence was settled by the verdict of the jury.
There are no complaints of the rulings of the trial court brought forward by bills of exception. Attempt is made by bringing forward the motion for new trial to invoke the consideration of the rulings of the court upon the admission and rejection of evidence. Such matters, in order to warrant consideration on appeal, must come by bills of exception. See Holliday v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 226; Madsen v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 439; Claybrook v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 88; Anderson v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 346.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.W.2d 169, 115 Tex. Crim. 38, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilford-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.