Gilfillin v. Rector

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Gilfillin v. Rector

126 S.E. 761, 131 S.C. 84, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 114

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 28, 1925

Docket11701

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 761 (Gilfillin v. Rector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilfillin v. Rector, 126 S.E. 761, 131 S.C. 84, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 114 (S.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justce Fraser.

The order of Judge Ansel is satisfactory to this Court and is affirmed. Two liens are provided for, and we know of no reason why the original Act should apply to the County Court of Greenville and the amended Act should not apply.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Justce Watts concurs. Mr. Justce Marion concurs in result. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justce Fraser.

The order of Judge Ansel is satisfactory to this Court and is affirmed. Two liens are provided for, and we know of no reason why the original Act should apply to the County Court of Greenville and the amended Act should not apply.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Justce Watts concurs. Mr. Justce Marion concurs in result. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 761, 131 S.C. 84, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilfillin-v-rector-sc-1925.