Gilfillin v. Rector

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Gilfillin v. Rector

126 S.E. 761, 131 S.C. 84, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 114

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 28, 1925·No. 11701·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justce Fraser.

The order of Judge Ansel is satisfactory to this Court and is affirmed. Two liens are provided for, and we know of no reason why the original Act should apply to the County Court of Greenville and the amended Act should not apply.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Justce Watts concurs. Mr. Justce Marion concurs in result. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justce Fraser.

The order of Judge Ansel is satisfactory to this Court and is affirmed. Two liens are provided for, and we know of no reason why the original Act should apply to the County Court of Greenville and the amended Act should not apply.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Justce Watts concurs. Mr. Justce Marion concurs in result. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate.

Gilfillin v. Rector, 126 S.E. 761, 131 S.C. 84, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 114 (S.C. 1925).

Pincite

126 S.E. 761 (Gilfillin v. Rector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.