Gilfillan v. Palmer

Nevada Supreme Court

Gilfillan v. Palmer

533 P.2d 456, 91 Nev. 182

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 1975·No. No. 7586·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this action by an attorney against his former client to recover attorney’s fees claimed to be due, the trial court found that all legal fees owing the attorney and his associated California counsel were paid by the client’s husband to California counsel pursuant to the terms of a property settlement agreement obligating the husband to pay such fees, and that the client’s obligation thereby was discharged. The record supports that finding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this action by an attorney against his former client to recover attorney’s fees claimed to be due, the trial court found that all legal fees owing the attorney and his associated California counsel were paid by the client’s husband to California counsel pursuant to the terms of a property settlement agreement obligating the husband to pay such fees, and that the client’s obligation thereby was discharged. The record supports that finding.

Affirmed.

Gilfillan v. Palmer, 533 P.2d 456, 91 Nev. 182 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

533 P.2d 456 (Gilfillan v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.