Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
This text of 426 F. App'x 816 (Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Adolfus Giles appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint of employment discrimination against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. The district court ruled that Giles’s complaint is barred by res judicata. Giles filed, in the same court, the same complaint against the same defendant a year earlier, and we affirmed the dismissal of that complaint. Giles v. Wal-Mart Distribution Ctr., 359 Fed.Appx. 91 (11th Cir.2009). Giles’s second complaint is clearly barred by res judicata. We affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 F. App'x 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-ca11-2011.