Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
426 F. App'x 816
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 16, 2011·No. No. 10-15196·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Adolfus Giles appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint of employment discrimination against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. The district court ruled that Giles’s complaint is barred by res judicata. Giles filed, in the same court, the same complaint against the same defendant a year earlier, and we affirmed the dismissal of that complaint. Giles v. Wal-Mart Distribution Ctr., 359 Fed.Appx. 91 (11th Cir.2009). Giles’s second complaint is clearly barred by res judicata. We affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 426 F. App'x 816 (11th Cir. 2011).
426 F. App'x 816 (Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adolfus O'Brien Giles v. WalMart Stores East LP
498 F. App'x 887 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Giles v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
181 L. Ed. 2d 351 (Supreme Court, 2011)