Giles v. W. E. Beverage Corp.
This text of 46 A.2d 728 (Giles v. W. E. Beverage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court, in the exercise of its fact-finding function, determined, on evidence that at best is subject to conflicting inferences, that appellants- had not sustained the burden of establishing that the death of the decedent was the result of an accident which arose out of his employment with respondent; and it is the settled rule that findings of fact on conflicting evidence, or on uneontroverted evidence reasonably susceptible of conflicting inferences, are conclusive on error.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Pabker, Donges, Hehee, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeebbty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.2d 728, 134 N.J.L. 234, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-w-e-beverage-corp-nj-1946.