Giles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Giles v. State

110 S.W.2d 916, 133 Tex. Crim. 316, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 562

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Giles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Tex. Crim. 454 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 1, 1937·No. No. 19204.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for theft of an autpmo-r *317 bile, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, save exceptions to the refusal of two special charges and the objections to the main charge of the court. In the absence of the statement of facts none of these exceptions can be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for theft of an autpmo-r *317 bile, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, save exceptions to the refusal of two special charges and the objections to the main charge of the court. In the absence of the statement of facts none of these exceptions can be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Giles v. State, 110 S.W.2d 916, 133 Tex. Crim. 316, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 562 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

110 S.W.2d 916 (Giles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.