Giles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Giles v. State

110 S.W.2d 916, 133 Tex. Crim. 316, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 562

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 1, 1937

DocketNo. 19204.

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.W.2d 916 (Giles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giles v. State, 110 S.W.2d 916, 133 Tex. Crim. 316, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 562 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for theft of an autpmo-r *317 bile, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, save exceptions to the refusal of two special charges and the objections to the main charge of the court. In the absence of the statement of facts none of these exceptions can be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for theft of an autpmo-r *317 bile, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, save exceptions to the refusal of two special charges and the objections to the main charge of the court. In the absence of the statement of facts none of these exceptions can be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.W.2d 916, 133 Tex. Crim. 316, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.