Giles v. State
177 S.W. 1167, 77 Tex. Crim. 207, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 43
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Giles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 Tex. Crim. 612 →
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of robbery, and prosecutes an appeal on the sole ground that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment, he contending that in one count thereof it undertook to charge two separate and distinct offenses. This contention is not well taken. Green v. State, 66 Texas Crim. Rep., 446, 147 S. W. Rep., 593.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Giles v. State, 177 S.W. 1167, 77 Tex. Crim. 207, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 43 (Tex. 1915).
177 S.W. 1167 (Giles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. State
147 S.W. 593 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)