Giles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Giles v. State

1925 OK CR 462, 240 P. 131, 32 Okla. Crim. 160, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 470

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 3, 1925

DocketNo. A-5161.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 462 (Giles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giles v. State, 1925 OK CR 462, 240 P. 131, 32 Okla. Crim. 160, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 470 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Sid Giles, was convicted on an information charging that, in Carter county, Feb-uary 8, 1923, he did have in his possession three pints of whisky with the willful and unlawful intent then and there to give, sell, barter, and otherwise furnish the same to others, and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he *161 was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined for 30 days in the county jail. On January 9, 1924, judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and from the judgment he appealed by filing in this court May 8, 1924, petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error, and the cause was submitted on the record-.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we have failed to discover anything whereof the plaintiff in error has just right to complain.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Sid Giles, was convicted on an information charging that, in Carter county, Feb-uary 8, 1923, he did have in his possession three pints of whisky with the willful and unlawful intent then and there to give, sell, barter, and otherwise furnish the same to others, and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he *161 was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined for 30 days in the county jail. On January 9, 1924, judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and from the judgment he appealed by filing in this court May 8, 1924, petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error, and the cause was submitted on the record-.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we have failed to discover anything whereof the plaintiff in error has just right to complain.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 462, 240 P. 131, 32 Okla. Crim. 160, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.