Giles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Giles v. State

262 So. 3d 881

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2019·No. No. 1D18-1110·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore , 768 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State , 98 So.3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore , 768 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State , 98 So.3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Giles v. State, 262 So. 3d 881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

262 So. 3d 881 (Giles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related