Giles v. Sacks
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 52
This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 52 (Giles v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Giles v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 52 (Ohio 1961).
Opinion
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-sacks-ohio-1961.