Giles v. Maryland
This text of 372 U.S. 767 (Giles v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GILES ET AL.
v.
MARYLAND.
Supreme Court of United States.
Hal Witt and Richard J. Scupi for appellants.
Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Russell R. Reno, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
James H. Heller and Lawrence Speiser for the National Capital Area Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 U.S. 767, 83 S. Ct. 1102, 10 L. Ed. 2d 137, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-maryland-scotus-1963.