Giles v. Law

Indiana Supreme Court

Giles v. Law

14 Ind. 16

DecidedJanuary 14, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 16 (Giles v. Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giles v. Law, 14 Ind. 16 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was correctly decided for the plaintiff below, for the reasons given in the case of Giles v. Gullion, 13 Ind. R. 487; but the judgment is for too much. There was only due on the note sued upon, at the time the judgment was rendered, the sum of 58 dollars, 60 cents, while the judgment is for 94 dollars, 33 cents. If the excess is remitted the judgment will be affirmed at the cost of the appellee for the amount due; otherwise the judgment will be reversed.

Note.—A remission having been filed, the judgment was affirmed for 58 dollars, 60 cents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was correctly decided for the plaintiff below, for the reasons given in the case of Giles v. Gullion, 13 Ind. R. 487; but the judgment is for too much. There was only due on the note sued upon, at the time the judgment was rendered, the sum of 58 dollars, 60 cents, while the judgment is for 94 dollars, 33 cents. If the excess is remitted the judgment will be affirmed at the cost of the appellee for the amount due; otherwise the judgment will be reversed.

Note.—A remission having been filed, the judgment was affirmed for 58 dollars, 60 cents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-law-ind-1860.