Giles v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Giles v. City of Tulsa

1923 OK CR 58, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 68, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 159

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 17, 1923

DocketNo. A-3865.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 58 (Giles v. City of Tulsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giles v. City of Tulsa, 1923 OK CR 58, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 68, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 159 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa on a charge of vagrancy, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $19. From the judgment rendered on the 9th day of August, 1920, an appeal by case-made with petition in error attached was filed' in this court on October 8, 1920. No brief has been filed. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa on a charge of vagrancy, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $19. From the judgment rendered on the 9th day of August, 1920, an appeal by case-made with petition in error attached was filed' in this court on October 8, 1920. No brief has been filed. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 58, 212 P. 1116, 23 Okla. Crim. 68, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-city-of-tulsa-oklacrimapp-1923.