Giles v. City of Mount Vernon

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 12, 2023·No. 7:20-cv-05119·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK MICHAEL GILES, Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, et al., Defendants. No. 20-CV-05119 (PMH) wee eK

PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: The Court will not accept the Rule 56.1 Statements that were filed in connection with the parties’ motion papers (Doc. 87, Doc. 90) for failure to comply with the Court’s Individual Practices. By October 26, 2023, the parties shall meet and confer and file a single revised joint Rule 56.1 Statement, which includes all parties’ statements of fact, any counterstatements of fact, and responses to each statement set forth therein. The revised Rule 56.1 Statement shall be limited to 25 pages and otherwise in compliance with the Court’s rules and rules applicable to summary judgment motion practice. See, e.g., Emanuel v. Gap, Inc., et al., 2022 WL 3084317 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2022).

SO ORDERED: Dated: White Plains, New York October 12, 2023 ( an ! ( PHILIP M. HALPERN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giles v. City of Mount Vernon, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Giles v. City of Mount Vernon (Giles v. City of Mount Vernon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.