Giles v. Betz.

15 Abb. Pr. 285
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedAugust 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Abb. Pr. 285 (Giles v. Betz.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giles v. Betz., 15 Abb. Pr. 285 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).

Opinion

Robertson, J.

Unless the entry by the plaintiff on the premises was a surrender, he is entitled to recover from the defendant all the back rent due him, except what he may receive from the premises. There was no necessity for the plaintiff to set forth the receipt by him of any money. If he chooses to waive part of his claim, or give the defendant credit for any sums, he has a right to do so; but he is not bound to go further, and show the persons from whom he received the sums. If the defendant needs any information for his defence, he must obtain it in some other way. The Code provides for the mode of obtaining items of an account (§ 158), if this be one. At all events, the plaintiff is not bound to furnish the defendant with the particulars of his offset.

The motion must be denied, with $1 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Candee v. Daying
66 How. Pr. 452 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Abb. Pr. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-betz-nysuperctnyc-1862.