Giles Drilling Corp. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giles Drilling Corp. v. City of New York

248 A.D. 701

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action for extra work claimed to have been done under a contract entered into with defendant for the making of borings and tests between Brooklyn and Staten Island for the proposed Narrows Vehicular Tunnel. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case after trial at Trial Term unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for extra work claimed to have been done under a contract entered into with defendant for the making of borings and tests between Brooklyn and Staten Island for the proposed Narrows Vehicular Tunnel. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case after trial at Trial Term unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Giles Drilling Corp. v. City of New York, 248 A.D. 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 701 (Giles Drilling Corp. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.