Gildon, Derrick Bernard
This text of Gildon, Derrick Bernard (Gildon, Derrick Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,206-01
EX PARTE DERRICK BERNARD GILDON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2016-11-7717-A IN THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CALHOUN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault
and sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Gildon v. State, No. 13-17-00692-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 7, 2018) (not
designated for publication).
In three grounds, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective. Applicant has alleged
facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte
Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts 2
are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to
respond to Applicant’s grounds. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold
a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court
shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 23, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gildon, Derrick Bernard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gildon-derrick-bernard-texcrimapp-2019.