Gildersleeve v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gildersleeve v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 796 (Gildersleeve v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gildersleeve v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24, 61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24 to reschedule a hearing pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and to permit petitioner to use a recording device thereat, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 13, 1977, as, upon ordering a new hearing, directed the board of education to allow petitioner to use a tape recorder. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. This was a completely frivolous and unnecessary appeal. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 24 to reschedule a hearing pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and to permit petitioner to use a recording device thereat, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 13, 1977, as, upon ordering a new hearing, directed the board of education to allow petitioner to use a tape recorder. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. This was a completely frivolous and unnecessary appeal. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gildersleeve-v-board-of-education-of-union-free-school-district-no-24-nyappdiv-1978.