Gilder v. State

126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 147, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 781
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15925
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 20 (Gilder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilder v. State, 126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 147, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 781 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of possessing intoxicating liquors was amply authorized. The assignments of error upon the overruling of the motion for a continuance and upon the excerpt from the charge of the court are without merit. For no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for á new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodtoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 147, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilder-v-state-gactapp-1924.