Gilder v. Hasty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Gilder v. Hasty

195 Ala. 690

DecidedDecember 16, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Ala. 690 (Gilder v. Hasty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilder v. Hasty, 195 Ala. 690 (Ala. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

This case is ruled by the decision in Smith v. Stiles, infra, 70 South. 905, in which it was held that Marengo constituted a separate circuit. On the authority of that case judgment must be reversed and judgment rendered granting prayer of petitioner requiring the probate judge to place his name upon the ballot as a candidate for judge of that circuit.

Anderson, C. J., McClellan, Mayfield, and Somerville,' JJ., concur. Sayre, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

This case is ruled by the decision in Smith v. Stiles, infra, 70 South. 905, in which it was held that Marengo constituted a separate circuit. On the authority of that case judgment must be reversed and judgment rendered granting prayer of petitioner requiring the probate judge to place his name upon the ballot as a candidate for judge of that circuit.

Anderson, C. J., McClellan, Mayfield, and Somerville,' JJ., concur. Sayre, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ala. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilder-v-hasty-ala-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack