Gilder v. Dickens

D.C. Circuit

Gilder v. Dickens

258 F. 962, 49 App. D.C. 62, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1919

DocketNo. 3222

StatusPublished

This text of 258 F. 962 (Gilder v. Dickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilder v. Dickens, 258 F. 962, 49 App. D.C. 62, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORDSDEE, Associate Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, the owner of certain premises in the District of Columbia, as landlord brought this action to recover possession from defendant as tenant by [963]*963sufferance. It appears that plaintiff was at the date of the bringing of this action in the employ of the government as a war worker and required the leased premises for occupancy as a residence. It is not material, therefore, that defendant was also a war worker, since the case is ruled by our opinion in Maxwell v. Brayshaw, 49 App. D. C. -, 258 Fed. 957.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORDSDEE, Associate Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, the owner of certain premises in the District of Columbia, as landlord brought this action to recover possession from defendant as tenant by [963]*963sufferance. It appears that plaintiff was at the date of the bringing of this action in the employ of the government as a war worker and required the leased premises for occupancy as a residence. It is not material, therefore, that defendant was also a war worker, since the case is ruled by our opinion in Maxwell v. Brayshaw, 49 App. D. C. -, 258 Fed. 957.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 F. 962, 49 App. D.C. 62, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilder-v-dickens-cadc-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack