Gilcrist v. Mosher
This text of 180 N.E.2d 296 (Gilcrist v. Mosher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Municipal Court of Columbus, Ohio, plaintiff-appellant’s Fourth Amended Petition was ordered stricken from the file. From that order plaintiff-appellant filed an appeal to this Court on questions of law.
Defendant-Appellee, Mayflower Insurance Company, filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the order of the Municipal Court was not a final order, judgment or decree from which an appeal may be taken, and cites as authority the cases of State, ex rel. Erman, v. Gillman, Director of Public Utilities of Cincinnati, et al., 126 Ohio St., 379; Olson v. Watson, 22 Ohio Law Abs., 118; National Surety Corporation v. Blackburn, 58 Ohio Law Abs., 193.
The plaintiff-appellant has not filed any memorandum in opposition to the motion and it appearing that the motion is well taken, it will be sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.E.2d 296, 87 Ohio Law. Abs. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilcrist-v-mosher-ohioctapp-1960.