Gilchrist v. State

101 So. 906, 20 Ala. App. 233, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 252
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 22, 1924
Docket8 Div. 171.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 So. 906 (Gilchrist v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilchrist v. State, 101 So. 906, 20 Ala. App. 233, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 252 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case is to the effect that defendant possessed at least one-half pint of whisky, which he sold and delivered to the' state’s witness. This is a violation of the statute. Ex parte State ex rel., etc., v. Harbin, 210 Ala. 55, 97 So. 426.

The charge, “if there is a probability of defendant’s innocence, you should find him not guilty,” while here insisted on as error, appears from the record to have been given. Moreover, this charge has been held bad in Edwards v. State. 205 Ala. 160, 87 So. 179, and consistently since that time.

Refused charge 2 is misleading.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. State
109 So. 554 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Ex Parte Gilchrist
101 So. 907 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 906, 20 Ala. App. 233, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilchrist-v-state-alactapp-1924.