Gilchrist v. Pearson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Gilchrist v. Pearson

70 Miss. 351

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 Miss. 351 (Gilchrist v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilchrist v. Pearson, 70 Miss. 351 (Mich. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, Cv J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

"Whatever may have been the authority of Nelson to represent Gilchrist as to his lands in Mississippi, there is nothing disclosed to suggest that he was authorized to biiid him by a contract to purchase 60,000 staves of Pearson, and sell them to Leonard, and the instruction to the jury to find for the defendant should have been given.

Reversed,. and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, Cv J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

"Whatever may have been the authority of Nelson to represent Gilchrist as to his lands in Mississippi, there is nothing disclosed to suggest that he was authorized to biiid him by a contract to purchase 60,000 staves of Pearson, and sell them to Leonard, and the instruction to the jury to find for the defendant should have been given.

Reversed,. and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 Miss. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilchrist-v-pearson-miss-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack