Gilchrist v. Howell Graves
130 So. 916, 222 Ala. 705
This text of 130 So. 916 (Gilchrist v. Howell Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gilchrist v. Howell Graves, 130 So. 916, 222 Ala. 705 (Ala. 1930).
Opinion
If not for other reasons; the decree of the circuit court must be affirmed upon the authority of Nicolopoolos v. Donovan, 221 Ala. 16, 127 So. 543. It is manifest that the complainant has a plain and adequate remedy at law active or defensive and the nonexistence of which is essential to the equity of the bill.
The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lane v. Roma Lumber Co.
176 So. 283 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 So. 916, 222 Ala. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilchrist-v-howell-graves-ala-1930.