Gilbertson v. Albright

368 F.3d 1062
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gilbertson v. Albright. Read the opinion of the Court — 381 F.3d 965
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2004·No. 02-35460·Published

Opinion

368 F.3d 1062

Paul Douglas GILBERTSON, Plaintiff — Appellant,
v.
Stuart H. ALBRIGHT; Keith R. Battleson; Jack W. Burris; Suzanne T. Crane; Charles L. Crump; Yolanda I. Guran-Postlethwaite; Charles W. Hester; Ron A. Hoffine; Robert V. Neathamer; R. Charles Pearson; Ronald E. Stuntzner; David P. Taylor; Robert A. Walker; Richard H. Zbinden, in their individual capacities, Defendants — Appellees.

No. 02-35460.

D.C. No. CV-01-06282-HO.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 17, 2004.

Daniel W. Dickerson, Esq., Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, AAG, Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbertson v. Albright, 368 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 2004).

368 F.3d 1062 (Gilbertson v. Albright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.