Gilbert's Patents, Ltd. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc.
34 F.2d 1019, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court for Massachusetts [30 F.(2d) 296] is affirmed, on the ground that the parties did not intend to be bound until a formal contract embodying all the terms of the contemplated license agreement was drawn up and signed.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilbert's Patents, Ltd. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc., 34 F.2d 1019, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353 (1st Cir. 1929).
34 F.2d 1019 (Gilbert's Patents, Ltd. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilbert's Patents, Ltd. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc.
30 F.2d 296 (D. Massachusetts, 1929)