Gilbert v. Walcher

895 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3052, 2005 WL 545239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2005·No. No. 4D05-771·Published

Opinion

STEVENSON, J.

Evan Gilbert seeks certiorari review of an order denying his motion for prejudgment attachment or sequestration of funds. We re-designate this petition as a non-final appeal, see Hordis Bros. v. Sentinel Holdings, Inc., 562 So.2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and summarily affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy’s Farm Co., 338 So.2d 1067, 1071 (Fla.1976)(noting that the due process clause of the United -States Constitution forbids the issuance of a prejudgment writ based on the plaintiffs bare allegations that he or she believes one of the statutory grounds exist).

AFFIRMED.

STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Walcher, 895 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3052, 2005 WL 545239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 531 (Gilbert v. Walcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy's Farm Co.
338 So. 2d 1067 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Hordis Bros., Inc. v. Sentinel Holdings, Inc.
562 So. 2d 715 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)