Gilbert v. Walcher
This text of 895 So. 2d 531 (Gilbert v. Walcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Evan Gilbert seeks certiorari review of an order denying his motion for prejudgment attachment or sequestration of funds. We re-designate this petition as a non-final appeal, see Hordis Bros. v. Sentinel Holdings, Inc., 562 So.2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and summarily affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy’s Farm Co., 338 So.2d 1067, 1071 (Fla.1976)(noting that the due process clause of the United -States Constitution forbids the issuance of a prejudgment writ based on the plaintiffs bare allegations that he or she believes one of the statutory grounds exist).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
895 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3052, 2005 WL 545239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-walcher-fladistctapp-2005.