Gilbert v. United States

610 F.3d 716, 2010 WL 2612358
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 1, 2010·No. No. 09-12513·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Presently before the court are:

1. Motion by Defendant/Appellant Gilbert for Release Pending Appeal/Remand;

[717]*7172. United States’ Response to Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending Appeal/Remand;

3. United States’ Unopposed Motion for Immediate Stay of the Mandate Pending Final Disposition of Possible Petition for Rehearing En Banc; and,

4. Appellant Gilbert’s Response to the Government’s Motion to Stay the Mandate.

We deal with these motions and responses as follows:

1. Defendani/Appellant Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending Appeal/Remand is GRANTED. The motion and this order are remanded to the district court for the district court, expeditiously, to impose conditions, if any, upon Gilbert’s release.

2. Inasmuch as a judge of this Court has caused the mandate to be held, the Government’s motion for immediate stay of the mandate is DENIED, AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. United States, 610 F.3d 716, 2010 WL 2612358 (11th Cir. 2010).

610 F.3d 716 (Gilbert v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory King v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
592 F. App'x 835 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
Scott v. United States
740 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Florida, 2010)