Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC

101 A.3d 1149
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 9, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.3d 1149 (Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC, 101 A.3d 1149 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is: [1150]*1150Did the Superior Court incorrectly interpret the Pennsylvania [RTFA] by requiring a jury trial to determine that the land application of biosolids falls within the Act’s definition of a “normal agricultural operation,” which was contrary to the Act and this Court’s precedent that statutes of repose and statutory interpretation present questions of law for resolution by courts, not juries?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.3d 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-synagro-central-llc-pa-2014.