Gilbert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Gilbert v. State

223 S.W.2d 622, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1426

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 19, 1949

DocketNo. 24489

StatusPublished

This text of 223 S.W.2d 622 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. State, 223 S.W.2d 622, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1426 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court for the offense of drawing and giving a check for $35 on the American National Bank of Austin, Texas, when he did not have sufficient funds in said bank to pay said check when it was presented for payment. Prior to the commission of said offense, he had been legally convicted of a like offense. His punishment was assessed [623]*623at confinement in the county jail for a period of three month's; and ■ from said judgment of conviction, he has appealed to this court.

The record is before' us without a statement of facts or' bills of exceptions. The information charges the offense in due and regular form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court for the offense of drawing and giving a check for $35 on the American National Bank of Austin, Texas, when he did not have sufficient funds in said bank to pay said check when it was presented for payment. Prior to the commission of said offense, he had been legally convicted of a like offense. His punishment was assessed [623]*623at confinement in the county jail for a period of three month's; and ■ from said judgment of conviction, he has appealed to this court.

The record is before' us without a statement of facts or' bills of exceptions. The information charges the offense in due and regular form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 S.W.2d 622, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.