Gilbert v. State

56 S.W.2d 880, 122 Tex. Crim. 542, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 1933
DocketNo. 15593.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 56 S.W.2d 880 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. State, 56 S.W.2d 880, 122 Tex. Crim. 542, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48 (Tex. 1933).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Attempt to commit arson is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The prosecution is for violation of article 1316, P. C., as it appears in chapter 82, Acts of the 42nd Legislature, Regular Session, page 124, which is an act to amend article 1316, as it appears in chapter 1, title 17, P. C., 1925. The penalty prescribed in article 1316, as it appears in the revision of the Penal Code of 1925 is not less than two nor more than seven years. The penalty prescribed in chapter 82 amending article 1316, is confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than five years. The caption of chapter 82 is as follows: “An Act to amend Article 1316, Chapter 1, Title 17, of the Penal Code of 1925; further defining the offense of an attempt to commit arson; and declaring an emergency.”

The omission from the caption of any notice of an intention to change the penalty renders the amending act inoperative. The subject is discussed at length in the case of Rotner v. State, 55 S. W. (2d) 98. The invalidity of the amending act because of its failure to comply with the demand of the Constitution, art. 3, sec. 35, leaves in force article 1316, as it appears in the Penal Code, and the prosecution for the offense is permissible thereunder.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Giles
502 S.W.2d 774 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
White v. State
440 S.W.2d 660 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Ex Parte Wilson
374 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Fouga v. State
351 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Ex Parte Jesus Garcia
67 S.W.2d 609 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.W.2d 880, 122 Tex. Crim. 542, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.