Gilbert v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gilbert v. State

239 S.W.3d 692, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2007 WL 4234630

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 4, 2007

DocketED 89438

StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W.3d 692 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. State, 239 S.W.3d 692, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2007 WL 4234630 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darriel Gilbert (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 29.15 and denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence of the jury verdict convicting him of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110 RSMo (2000) 1 , armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 and second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060. Movant was sentenced to ten *693 years for kidnapping, twenty years for armed criminal action and five years for assault, to be served consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darriel Gilbert (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule 29.15 and denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence of the jury verdict convicting him of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110 RSMo (2000) 1 , armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 and second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060. Movant was sentenced to ten *693 years for kidnapping, twenty years for armed criminal action and five years for assault, to be served consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000), unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 S.W.3d 692, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2007 WL 4234630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-moctapp-2007.