Gilbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilbert v. State

700 So. 2d 55, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10266, 1997 WL 545586

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 1997

DocketNo. 97-2155

StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 55 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. State, 700 So. 2d 55, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10266, 1997 WL 545586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for postconviction relief which was filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the trial court’s order because the defendant’s motion was not timely filed and because the issues raised therein are successive. See Penn v. State, 688 So.2d 450 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Davis v. State, 654 So.2d 667 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for postconviction relief which was filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the trial court’s order because the defendant’s motion was not timely filed and because the issues raised therein are successive. See Penn v. State, 688 So.2d 450 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Davis v. State, 654 So.2d 667 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 55, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10266, 1997 WL 545586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack