Gilbert v. State

558 So. 2d 149, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1990 WL 26670
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1990·No. No. 89-1831·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The errors asserted in defendant’s second petition for post-conviction relief were either presented or could have been presented in defendant’s first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So.2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. State, 558 So. 2d 149, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1990 WL 26670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 149 (Gilbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Witt v. State
465 So. 2d 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Tafero v. State
524 So. 2d 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Booker v. State
503 So. 2d 888 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Williams v. State
557 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)