Gilbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilbert v. State

558 So. 2d 149, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1990 WL 26670

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1831

StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 149 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. State, 558 So. 2d 149, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1990 WL 26670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The errors asserted in defendant’s second petition for post-conviction relief were either presented or could have been presented in defendant’s first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So.2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The errors asserted in defendant’s second petition for post-conviction relief were either presented or could have been presented in defendant’s first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So.2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 So. 2d 149, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1990 WL 26670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack