Gilbert v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Gilbert v. State

121 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 629

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 19, 1929

Docket7 Div. 511.

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 922 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. State, 121 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 629 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

This entire record, including the whole evidence in the case, has been examined and read by the court, sitting en bane. We are clear to the conclusion that appellant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted, oh the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and, for the error, in overruling it, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

This entire record, including the whole evidence in the case, has been examined and read by the court, sitting en bane. We are clear to the conclusion that appellant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted, oh the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and, for the error, in overruling it, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-alactapp-1929.