Gilbert v. Mendenhall

150 So. 137, 112 Fla. 86
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 22, 1933·Published

Opinion

*87 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the resepective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised, of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Brown, J., dissent. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Mendenhall, 150 So. 137, 112 Fla. 86 (Fla. 1933).

150 So. 137 (Gilbert v. Mendenhall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.