Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co.

7 Wend. 511

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 8, 1832

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Wend. 511 (Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co., 7 Wend. 511 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The default is satisfactorily excused, and the defendants are entitled to have it opened, on payment of costs. [Mr. Justice Nelson intimated, that in a case like this, where a party is entitled to a preference on the calendar, the cause should regularly be moved during the first week of term, as in case of frivolous demurrers and frivolous bills of exceptions, so that the opposite party need not attend during a whole term to watch the proceedings of his adversary.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The default is satisfactorily excused, and the defendants are entitled to have it opened, on payment of costs. [Mr. Justice Nelson intimated, that in a case like this, where a party is entitled to a preference on the calendar, the cause should regularly be moved during the first week of term, as in case of frivolous demurrers and frivolous bills of exceptions, so that the opposite party need not attend during a whole term to watch the proceedings of his adversary.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Wend. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-manchester-iron-manufacturing-co-nysupct-1832.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack