Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co.

7 Wend. 511
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1832·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The default is satisfactorily excused, and the defendants are entitled to have it opened, on payment of costs. [Mr. Justice Nelson intimated, that in a case like this, where a party is entitled to a preference on the calendar, the cause should regularly be moved during the first week of term, as in case of frivolous demurrers and frivolous bills of exceptions, so that the opposite party need not attend during a whole term to watch the proceedings of his adversary.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co., 7 Wend. 511 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

7 Wend. 511 (Gilbert v. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Randlett
33 Cal. 318 (California Supreme Court, 1867)