Gilbert v. Lyndonville Central School District

286 A.D.2d 896, 730 N.Y.S.2d 638, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Lyndonville Central School District (Lyndonville) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Although Lyndonville established as a matter of law that plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in the game of volleyball by participating on Lyndonville’s varsity volleyball team, we conclude that plaintiff raised an issue of fact whether Lyndonville exposed her to “unassumed, concealed or unreasonably increased risks” by directing or allowing her to warm up in a hazardous location (Weller v Colleges of the Senecas, 217 AD2d 280, 283; see, Benitez v New York City Bd. ofEduc., 73 NY2d 650, 658). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Punch, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurl-butt, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Lyndonville Central School District, 286 A.D.2d 896, 730 N.Y.S.2d 638, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 896 (Gilbert v. Lyndonville Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ulin v. Hobart & William Smith Colls.
2018 NY Slip Op 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Muller v. Spencerport Central School District
55 A.D.3d 1388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)