Gilbert v. Lyndonville Central School District
This text of 286 A.D.2d 896 (Gilbert v. Lyndonville Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Lyndonville Central School District (Lyndonville) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Although Lyndonville established as a matter of law that plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in the game of volleyball by participating on Lyndonville’s varsity volleyball team, we conclude that plaintiff raised an issue of fact whether Lyndonville exposed her to “unassumed, concealed or unreasonably increased risks” by directing or allowing her to warm up in a hazardous location (Weller v Colleges of the Senecas, 217 AD2d 280, 283; see, Benitez v New York City Bd. ofEduc., 73 NY2d 650, 658). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Punch, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurl-butt, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 896, 730 N.Y.S.2d 638, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-lyndonville-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2001.