Gilbert v. Kaur
This text of Gilbert v. Kaur (Gilbert v. Kaur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9} DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00439-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 12 | KAMAL PREET KAUR, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 5) 14 15 On May 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 5.) In light of 16 | the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. 17 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. 18 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 19 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 49 | Dated: _May 27, 2022 : UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilbert v. Kaur, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-kaur-caed-2022.