Gilbert v. Kaur

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9} DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00439-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE KAMAL PREET KAUR, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 5) On May 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 5.) In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 49 Dated: _May 27, 2022 : UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE