Gilbert v. Joyal

190 A. 809, 89 N.H. 557, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 45
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided April 6, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Assuming that both parties were asleep at the time of the accident, it might be found that the plaintiff was not at fault (Salvas v. Cantin, 85 N. H. 489), and that the defendant was. (Bushnell v. Bushnell, 103 Conn. 583.)

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Joyal, 190 A. 809, 89 N.H. 557, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 45 (N.H. 1937).

190 A. 809 (Gilbert v. Joyal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullins v. Boston & Maine Transportation Co.
20 A.2d 636 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1941)