Gilbert v. Ickes

123 F.2d 917, 74 App. D.C. 327, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2847
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 1941
DocketNo. 7912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 F.2d 917 (Gilbert v. Ickes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Ickes, 123 F.2d 917, 74 App. D.C. 327, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2847 (D.C. Cir. 1941).

Opinion

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The appeal is from an order dismissing appellant’s suit upon allegations identical in all substantial and material respects with those made in the complaint in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson,-App.D.C.-, 123 F.2d 909, decided this day. The issues presented by the two cases are identical and the results must be the same. For the reasons which have been stated in the opinion which has been rendered in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson, the orders are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Dallas, Texas v. Rentzel
172 F.2d 122 (Fifth Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F.2d 917, 74 App. D.C. 327, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-ickes-cadc-1941.