Gilbert v. Hanner

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Gilbert v. Hanner

187 So. 2d 133, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5333

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 23, 1966·No. No. 10521·Published

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action was the driver of the truck involved in the accident, and seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed.

[134]*134For tlie reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128, which has this day been decided;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action was the driver of the truck involved in the accident, and seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed.

[134]*134For tlie reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128, which has this day been decided;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Gilbert v. Hanner, 187 So. 2d 133, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5333 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

187 So. 2d 133 (Gilbert v. Hanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related