Gilbert v. Hanner

187 So. 2d 133, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5333
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 23, 1966
DocketNo. 10521
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 133 (Gilbert v. Hanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Hanner, 187 So. 2d 133, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5333 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action was the driver of the truck involved in the accident, and seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands he has appealed.

[134]*134For tlie reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128, which has this day been decided;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
187 So. 2d 128 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 2d 133, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-hanner-lactapp-1966.