Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.
This text of 152 Misc. 598 (Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An action in conversion for damages for unlawful repossession of the automobile of plaintiff’s assignor is not one to recover possession of a specific chattel or chattels as provided in [599]*599rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 5, so as to warrant the granting of a motion for summary judgment brought under this and rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 Misc. 598, 273 N.Y.S. 815, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-gotham-credit-corp-nyappterm-1934.