Gilbert v. Gilbert

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gilbert v. Gilbert

481 S.W.3d 81, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 42, 2016 WL 316024

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 2016

DocketNo. ED 101928

StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 81 (Gilbert v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. Gilbert, 481 S.W.3d 81, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 42, 2016 WL 316024 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amy .Michelle Gilbert, n/k/a Amy Michelle Whiteside (“Mother”), appeals the trial court’s judgment granting Norman Ray Gilbert’s (“Father’s”) objection to Mothers' proposed relocation of the parties’ minor children. Mother also appeals the trial court’s calculation of Father’s retroactive child ■ support obligation and the trial court’s order requiring Mother to pay [82]*82a portion of Father’s attorney’s fees. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amy .Michelle Gilbert, n/k/a Amy Michelle Whiteside (“Mother”), appeals the trial court’s judgment granting Norman Ray Gilbert’s (“Father’s”) objection to Mothers' proposed relocation of the parties’ minor children. Mother also appeals the trial court’s calculation of Father’s retroactive child ■ support obligation and the trial court’s order requiring Mother to pay [82]*82a portion of Father’s attorney’s fees. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.3d 81, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 42, 2016 WL 316024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-gilbert-moctapp-2016.